"But war, in a good cause, is not the greatest evil which a nation can suffer. War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice – a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice – is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other."

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Maybe politics DOES stop at the water's edge

All I can say is, wow. Good for you, Chuck Rangel and Nancy Pelosi. Whatever disagreements we have at home (and they are many, and they are bitter), we're not so far gone that we don't stand up to some egotistical tinpot dictator punk who thinks he can lecture us on our own soil. Now if only Chavez would take Noam Chomsky with him . . .

No comments: